This post from 9Rules is so intriguing, I just have to copy and paste it:
*****
At the beginning of 2006 Barry Neuman, art dealer, remarked to Artnet Magazine:
I think it’s a safe bet that there will be 50 to 60 new
and bona fide (i.e., seriously authored by qualified people) art world
blogs by the end of the year.
… to which Kriston Capps, writer for the Smithsonian’s Eye Level blog responded:
“Seriously authored by qualified people,” [is] a sentiment totally contrary to the esprit de corps
of the blogosphere. What’s in fact great about most blogs is that they
are nonseriously authored by nonqualified people. By the best count
I’ve read, there are around 400–500 art blogs in the nation. Assuming
even half of those are updated regularly, that amounts to a virtual
library of information about artists, trends, and institutions. Even if
not all these blogs are of the highest quality, the cream rises—and
distributes the best information from the lesser-known blogs. To a
certain extent, blogs survive by this network. (…)
(…) Artists, professionals, and enthusiasts writing about art are in fact part of the “actual, hands-on, real-world art scene.”
*****
As someone who reads dozens and dozens of blogs everyday, I
am sort of taken back by a simplified statement imagining 50-60 "seriously
qualified" art world blogs. Is that to say, that in the entire modern
world Barry Newman believes that there is only a handful of "seriously
qualified" art experts in the world, and even fewer who have a grasp on
new media and it's power to reach masses of people?
To be certain, these are two experts in their own right
holding this debate. But still, limiting "experts" and what
constitutes legitimately "impacting the actual, hands-on, real-world art
scene, locally and internationally" is all-together turning a nose to the
real-world art scene and dismissing it completely.
For that matter, what is his definition of
"real-world" and if the thousands of active art collectors in the
world don't apply - to whom is this impactive information going?
I encourage you to read Eye Level's Forward Motion
by Kriston Capps and Artnet's Predictions
For 2006 and decide for yourself...